fbpx

Maria Belesioti – University of the Aegean, 41 Kountouriotou Str. 82100, Chios, Greece

Michail Glykas – Department of Financial and Management Engineering, School of Engineering, University of the Aegean, Kountouriotou 42, Chios, 82100, Greece

Keywords:
Corporate Social
Responsibility;
Maturity Model;
CSR Maturity Assessment
Framework;
ISO26000:2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ITEMA.2022.239

Abstract: Recently, there has been an increasing interest in defining Corpo­rate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the factors that have the potential to in­fluence it. CSR has become an essential strategic tool and its initiatives have increased in variety and scope, impacting communities and businesses in economic, environmental, and social terms as a means of raising the so­cial profile and maximizing the corporation’s long-term economic and so­cial value. This paper aims to introduce the concept of Corporate Social Re­sponsibility and to investigate the key enabling factors and constraints that play a crucial role in the adoption and implementation of CSR initiatives. For this, a holistic framework, namely a Corporate Social Responsibility Ma­turity Model (CSRMM) for CSR assessment will be analyzed and presented.

6th International Scientific Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology, Tourism, Economics, Management and Agriculture – ITEMA 2022 – Conference Proceedings, Hybrid (University of Maribor, Slovenia), October 27, 2022

ITEMA Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ITEMA conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, Slovenia; Faculty of Organization and Informatics, University of Zagreb, Varaždin; Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Serbia; Institute of Marketing, Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poland; Faculty of Agriculture, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania”, Romania

ITEMA Conference 2022 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-63-9, ISSN 2683-5991, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ITEMA.2022

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.

Suggested citation

Belesioti, M., & Glykas, M. (2022). A Holistic CSR Maturity Assessment Model. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), International Scientific Conference ITEMA 2022: Vol 6. Conference Proceedings (pp. 239-252). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ITEMA.2022.239

References

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman ([1st ed.]). Harper.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850

Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society, 38(3), 268-295.

Carson, S. G. (2015). Etikk for beslutningstakere. Cappelen Damm akademisk.

Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C. & Trevino, L. K. (2013), Political ideologies of CEOs the influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility, Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197-232

Commission Staff Working Document. (SWD), Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Busi­ness Conduct, and Business and Human Rights: Overview of Progress

Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-014512-1

De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance, Business & Society

Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 155–169.

Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key perfor­mance drivers he key performance drivers. Long range planning, 34(5), 585-604.

Foreign Policy Centre (London England) & Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility. (2001). Third generation corporate citizenship: public policy and business in society. Foreign Policy Centre.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance driv­ers, Found at Freeman R. E. & McVea J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic manage­ment. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

French, P. A. (1979). The Corporation as a Moral Person, American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 207-215.

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, p. 13. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 

Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51 – 71, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34 

Glykas, M. (2019). Quality Management Review: A Case Study of the Application of the Glykas Qual­ity Implementation Compass, Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technolo­gy, 6 (12), ISSN: 2458-9403

Goyal, P., & Kumar, D. (2017). Modeling the CSR barriers in manufacturing industries. Benchmark­ing: An International Journal, 24(7) 1871–1890. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2015-0088

Hsu, K.-T. (2012). The advertising effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and brand equity: evidence from the life insurance industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Eth­ics 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1118-0 

Kourula, A., & Halme, M. (2008). Types of corporate responsibility and engagement with NGOs: an exploration of business and societal outcomes. Corporate Governance: The International Jour­nal of Business in Society, 8(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810899275 

Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410281 

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility customer satisfaction and mar­ket value. Journal of Marketing 70(4), 1–18.

Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: a critical re­view and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00278.x 

Marques-Mendes, A., & Santos, M. J. (2016), Strategic CSR: an integrative model for analysis, Social Responsibility Journal 12(2), 363-381 https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2015-0055 

Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of business ethics, 45(1), 109-120.

Mirvis, P., & Googins, B. (2006). Stages of Corporate Citizenship: A Developmental Framework, A Center for Corporate Citizenship, Boston College Monograph, Boston

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 78, 1-16

Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When Consumers Doubt, Watch Out! The Role of CSR Skepti­cism. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1831-1838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004 

Tuan, T. L. (2012). Corporate social responsibility leadership and brand equity in healthcare service. Social Responsibility Journal 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211247929

Zadek, S. (2004). The Path to Corporate Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 125 – 132.

Connect with us

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of ten years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkans region and worldwide.

ITEMA conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.