fbpx
Alexandru-Mihai Bugheanu
Bogdan-Stefan Stoica
Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana No.6, Bucharest, Romania
Doctoral School of Management, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana No.6, Bucharest, Romania
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/itema.2018.660

2nd International Scientific Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology, Tourism, Economics, Management and Agriculture – ITEMA 2018 – Graz, Austria, November 8, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; ISBN 978-86-80194-13-4

Abstract

The importance of public transportation networks implies the necessity of identifying potential risks that could negatively influence the quality of the services. Public transport networks are very developed in Romania, 22% of the individuals using public transport daily, compared with an average of 16% in the European Union for 2017.

The main objective of the current paper is to present some of the risks to which passengers are exposed along with the effects on the quality of transport services.

Accordingly, the purpose of this article is to present an extensive research of the specialized literature in the field of risks in public transport systems. 

The key findings of this study is the fact that identifying the risks to which passengers are exposed should be one of the priorities for any public transport operator or public administration. All things considered, authorities should ensure a gradual increase in terms of effectiveness and efficiency for the public transport services.

Key words

public transport, risk management, urban life quality, strategies.


References

  1. Malasek, Jacek. (2016) A set of tools for making urban transport more sustainable, 6th Transport Research Arena, available at Transportation Research Procedia 14 ( 2016 ), pp. 876–885.
  2. International Energy Agency. (2002) Bus systems for the future. Achieving sustainable transport worldwide, IEA Publications, Paris, pp. 17-18.
  3. Conca A., Ridella C., Saporiz E. (2016) A risk assessment for road transportation of dangerous goods: a routing solution, 6th Transport Research Arena, available at Transportation Research Procedia 14, pp. 2890 – 2899.
  4. (2015) Multi-modal journey planning made easy to encourage the use of sustainable modes of transport. Available at: www.myway-project.eu.
  5. International Energy Agency. (2009) Transport, energy and CO2. Moving toward sustainability, IEA Publications, Paris, pp. 52-54.
  6. International Organization for Standardization. (2012), ISO road safety standard could help save thousands of lives, available at https://www.iso.org/news/2012/10/Ref1661.html.
  7. International Organization for Standardization. (2012), Road traffic safety (RTS) management systems — Requirements with guidance for use, available at https://www.iso.org/standard/44958.html.
  8. Conca A., Ridella C., Saporiz E. (2016) A risk assessment for road transportation of dangerous goods: a routing solution, 6th Transport Research Arena, available at Transportation Research Procedia 14, pp. 2890 – 2899.
  9. Fabiano, B., Palazzi, E., Currò, F., Pastorino, R. (2002) A framework for risk assessment and decision-making strategies in dangerous good transportation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 93, pp. 1–15, ISSN 0304-3894.
  10. Nazer Z., Jaffe R. (2006) Regional ITS Architecture for London Olympics, Proceedings of 13th ITS World Congress, London.
  11. Darido G., Osama T., Schneck D. (2003) The Role for ITS in Transport Planning and Operations of Olympic Events: Case Studies and Lessons Learned, Proceedings of 10th World Congress Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Madrid.
  12. Olga Krivolapova. (2017) Algorithm for Risk Assessment in the Introduction of Intelligent Transport Systems Facilities, 12th International Conference “Organization and Traffic Safety Management in large cities”, available at Transportation Research Procedia 20, pp. 373-377.
  13. Winter, K., Cats O., Correia G., Arem van B. (2018), Performance analysis and fleet requirements of automated demand-responsive transport systems as an urban public transport service, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology 7, pp. 151-167.
  14. Koziol, J., Gromek, P.(2017), Creating safety in transport – traffic risk approach, TRANSCOM 2017: International scientific conference on sustainable, modern and safe transport, available at Procedia Engineering 192, pp. 457-462.

 

bugheanu_stoica_a_review_of_methods_for_assessing_the_potential_risks_in_urban_passenger_transport_pp_660-666

Connect with us

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of ten years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkans region and worldwide.

ITEMA conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.